How you handle your IRA’s tax liabilities can have big implications for your loved ones.

If you are someone who has been financially successful enough to secure more than sufficient assets for a comfortable retirement, you may have wondered how best to achieve the goal of maximizing the value of an IRA inheritance for your loved ones, while minimizing the burden of the taxes that come along with it.  This article takes a quick look at two possible approaches. 

Baseline or “Current” Scenario 

First, as a baseline, consider the case of someone who begins taking mandated withdrawals (“Required Minimum Distributions” or RMDs) from his or her IRA at age 70.5.  If the IRA owner relies on other portfolio assets for retirement and living expenses, then assume that he or she reinvests the mandated RMDs. 

This approach will leave the bulk of the IRA balance intact upon the owner’s death.  So on transfer to the owner’s beneficiaries, the full tax liability remains intact as well.  If the IRA owner is (for example) age 80 when he or she dies, then his or her beneficiaries will likely be in their 50s or 60s and at the peak of their career income levels.  Since income taxes are due on the amount the beneficiary receives from the IRA, the inherited assets will likely be taxed at a high rate, and they may even push the beneficiary into a higher tax bracket, with correspondingly higher taxes. 

On a $500,000 IRA, for example, a beneficiary in the 35% federal tax bracket would pay $175,000 in taxes, which would reduce his or her inheritance to $325,000. 

Alternative One: Offsetting IRA Income Taxes

One way to avoid the $175,000 tax hit in the above scenario would be for the IRA owner to channel the mandated withdrawals into an investment designed to offset the beneficiary’s taxes at the time of inheritance. One strategy for this is to use a portion of these RMDs to help pay for a life insurance policy equal to the estimated amount of income tax that will be due upon inheritance, with the same beneficiary as the IRA. This will allow the full value of the IRA to pass to the beneficiary.

Using the same numbers as above, the IRA owner would purchase life insurance equal to the estimated $175,000 tax liability on the inherited IRA. Upon the owner’s death, his or her beneficiary would be able to use the life insurance benefits to pay off the IRA tax liability and retain the full value of the IRA: $500,000.*

Alternative Two: Eliminating IRA Beneficiary Income Taxes

A second but similar approach to maximizing wealth transfer from an IRA is to take steps to eliminate the associated federal income taxes entirely.  One way to achieve this is to name a tax-exempt charity as the IRA beneficiary. Because of their tax-exempt status, charities can receive inherited IRA funds with no tax liability at all. Again using the numbers from the initial example above, if the IRA owner’s favorite charity were the sole beneficiary, it would receive the full $500,000 value of the IRA upon inheritance.

In this scenario, for the IRA owner to pass to loved ones the equivalent value of the IRA tax free, he or she could use required withdrawals (RMDs) to help pay for a life insurance policy equal to the estimated peak value of the IRA. Upon the IRA owner’s death, the policy’s beneficiaries would then receive the equivalent amount of the full value of the IRA: $500,000.  

The advantage of the second approach is that the IRA owner will be able to transfer twice the value of the IRA upon death completely tax free, to beneficiaries of his or her choosing. In this case, the beneficiaries (the owner’s loved ones and the tax-exempt charity) would receive a collective total of $1,000,000, with no federal income tax liability.*

The chart below compares the wealth-transfer impact of the three approaches discussed above (baseline and alternatives one and two): 

leaving a legacy chart - image

Many retirees rely heavily on the income they receive from their IRAs to live.  But if you are among those fortunate enough to have sufficient additional resources to cover your expected retirement expenses, then the two approaches discussed above are well worth considering as a means to maximize the wealth-transfer value of your individual retirement account. 

To learn more about this topic, download the original article in its entirety in PDF.

*Life Insurance death benefits are generally tax-free for beneficiaries under IRC101(a), but may be taxable in part or whole under certain situations.

American General Life Insurance Company, its affiliates, and their distributors and representatives may not give tax, accounting or legal advice. Any tax statements in this material are not intended to suggest the avoidance of U.S. federal, state or local tax penalties. Such discussions generally are based upon the company’s understanding of current tax rules and interpretations. Tax laws are subject to legislative modification, and while many such modifications will have only a prospective application, it is important to recognize that a change could have retroactive effect as well. Individuals should not rely on the information or suggestions provided in this article and should seek the advice of an independent tax advisor or attorney for more complete information concerning their particular circumstances and any tax statements made in this material.